🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.